THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234

 

TO:

Full Board

FROM:

James A. Kadamus

SUBJECT:

Analysis of Graduation Rates for the 2001 Student Cohort

DATE:

January 4, 2006

 

STRATEGIC GOAL:

Goals 1 and 2

AUTHORIZATION(S):

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Issue for Discussion

 

Does the graduation rate data for the 2000 and 2001 student cohorts support the initiatives to be undertaken for high schools in the Call to Action follow-up document to the New York Education Summit, especially setting targets for high school graduation and holding local school boards and the Chancellor of the New York City schools accountable for high school performance?

 

Reason(s) for Consideration

 

Review of policy.

Proposed Handling

 

This question will come before the full Board at your January meeting.

 

Procedural History

 

Last month, the Regents received summary data on the outcomes of students in the 2000 cohort for all public high schools in the State, in New York City, and in the rest of State as well as data on selected performance indicators for the 127 high schools identified as having graduation rates under 70 percent.  Staff indicated they would provide additional data analyses relating to the 2001 student cohort for the January meeting.


Background Information

 

In December 2004, the Committee received an analysis of the Regents exam performance and educational outcomes of students who first entered grade 9 in the 2000-01 school year.  It showed a disturbing picture of many students who entered high school unprepared to do high school-level work, do not pass their courses and earn fewer than the 22 local high school credits they need for graduation in four years.  Further, the data showed that these students were concentrated originally in 135 high schools in 12 school districts and represented about 22 percent of the State’s high school enrollment.  Several of those high schools were closed in 2005 so we now have 127 schools from 12 school districts that we are tracking. 

 

For your January meeting, we are providing statewide graduation rate results for the 2000 and 2001 student cohorts and school-level graduation rate data for the identified 127 high schools.  A separate report will be submitted to the Regents EMSC-VESID Committee in January on the New York State High School Initiative which identifies activities undertaken by the 12 school districts last year and the commitments they have identified to undertake in 2006.  In February, we will provide disaggregated data for the 2001 student cohort and the 127 high schools.

 

We continue to establish ongoing capacity building with teams from the 12 districts and 127 schools and to create a greater sense of urgency to improve student performance.  That work has concentrated on a short list of practices with a high probability of success.  As we learned at the Summit on New York Education, additional work is needed to build urgency on high schools in areas such as the following:

 

1.               Set targets for high school graduation and measure results.

2.               Make local school boards accountable for high school performance.

3.               Check teacher qualifications and order changes where necessary to ensure qualified staff.

4.               Strengthen teaching through professional developed focused on proven curricula and lesson plans.

5.               Update school safety plans.

6.               Engage the public and students.

7.               Improve achievement among the highest performing students.

 

Recommendation

 

We recommend that the Regents review the attached data analyses and begin the discussion of how to set targets for high school graduation and how to engage local school boards and the Chancellor of the New York City schools on strategies for improving high school performance.

 

Timetable for Implementation

 

Staff will continue to provide the Committee with reports on the progress of the 127 high schools in improving student performance.

 

Attachments


Analysis of Graduation Rates for the 2001 Cohort Based on the 2005 STEP File

 

Last month, we presented the Board of Regents with data on the outcomes of students in the 2000 cohort, students who first entered grade 9 in the 2000-01 school year. We presented data for all public high schools in the State, in New York City, and in the rest of State. We also presented outcomes for 127 of the 135 high schools identified in January 2005 as having graduation rates under 70 percent that had already been identified as needing improvement or as under Registration Review (SURR) under the State accountability system. These schools are located in 12 school districts: New York City, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Yonkers, Mount Vernon, Amsterdam, Roosevelt, Hempstead, Wyandanch, Freeport and Central Islip.

This paper presents graduation rates for the 2001 cohort for public schools, statewide, in New York City, and in rest of State schools, and in the 127 high schools identified in January 2005.  The figures are based on analyses of student records in the STEP files submitted to the Department in August 2005, which reported on student outcomes through June 30, 2005.

Review of 2000 Cohort Results

Table 1 reviews the outcomes of the 2000 cohort after four years (presented in December 2004) and after five years (presented in December 2005). The four-year outcomes were based on STEP files submitted by districts in August 2004; the five-year outcomes were based on STEP files submitted by districts in August 2005. The Department began collecting high school assessment and outcome data through STEP in fall 2002. In each subsequent year, the files have become more complete and accurate. Compared with the 2004 STEP file, the 2005 STEP files included almost 11,000 additional students identified as entering high school in 2000-01.  Since records were unlikely to be omitted for cohort members who graduated, it is reasonable to assume that, if records for these additional students had been included in the 2004 STEP files, the graduation rate would have been lower than 67.4 percent.

An example of the increased accuracy of reporting is that over 7,000 additional cohort members were reported as transferring to general education development (GED) program in 2005 than in 2004. We provided additional technical assistance to districts on reporting transfers to GED in 2004-05.

The data in Table 1 document that many students who are reported as still enrolled after four years of high school will graduate in the fifth year, transfer to GED, or drop out.  Nevertheless, 5.7 percent of the 2000 cohort was still enrolled at the end of their fifth year of high school.


Table 1

The Percentage of Students in the 2000 Cohort by Outcome

After Four Years (June 30, 2004) and After Five Year (June 30, 2005) for All Public High Schools

Outcome

as of June 30, 2004

as of June 30, 2005

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Regents/Local Diploma

134,248

67.4

149,757

71.3

IEP Diploma

2,889

1.4

4,369

2.1

Enrolled

34,548

17.3

11,893

5.7

Transferred to GED

3,615

1.8

11,946

5.7

Dropped Out

23,796

11.9

32,194

15.3

Total

199,312*

100.0

210,159

100.0

*         The total includes 216 students reported as exiting for other reasons.

2001 Cohort Results

The 2005 STEP file included records for 259,692 students (both general-education students and students with disabilities) reported to have first entered grade 9 in the 2001-02 school year. Of those records, 214,494 reported students who had graduated, earned an IEP diploma, dropped out, entered a GED program, or were still enrolled. The records of these students were used in these analyses. Another 11,982 records reported that a student had left New York State public schools to transfer out of State, to a nonpublic school, or to home instruction, or that the student had died. Because these students were no longer in the pool of possible graduates, these records were removed from the study. The remaining 33,216 records reported that the student had transferred to another district at some time between first entering grade 9 in the 2001-02 school year and June 30, 2005. These students were assumed to have duplicate records reported by the district to which the student transferred and were not included in the study.

Table 2 compares the number of records for each cohort reported in STEP with the first–time grade 9 enrollment reported on the annual BEDS forms in fall 2000 and fall 2001 and with the number of grade 8 students tested in May 2000 and May 2001. In relation to reported first-time grade 9 enrollment, the number of 2005 STEP records for students in the 2000 and 2001 cohorts was equivalent.  Because students may enter the cohort after grade 9, it is not unexpected that cohort membership would exceed grade 9 enrollment.  In comparing the number of 2005 STEP records for each cohort with the number of grade 8 students taking the mathematics assessment in May 2000 and 2001, the 2005 STEP records indicated an increased number of tested students for the 2001 cohort than the 2000 cohort.


Table 2

Comparison of Records Reported through STEP with BEDS First-Time Grade 9 Enrollment and Number Tested on Grade 8 Mathematics Assessment

 

2000 Cohort

2001 Cohort

2004 STEP

2005 STEP

2005 STEP

Number of Student Records Reported

199,312

210,159

214,494

Number of Cohort Tested in Grade 8

198,512

198,512

199,330

First-Time Grade 9 Enrollment (BEDS)

203,917

 

207,315

 

Tables 3-5 show the percentages of 2001 cohort members in each outcome category as of June 30, 2005. Statewide, four years after first entering grade 9, more than 64 percent of this cohort had graduated and another 1.8 percent had earned IEP diplomas. Based on the 2000 cohort results, we can expect the percentage of graduates to increase substantially by June 30, 2006. The grade 9 enrollment in 2001 exceeded that in 2000 by 3,398 students. Comparing the number of graduates shows that the count for the 2001 cohort exceeded the count for the 2000 cohort by 3,456.  The number of IEP diplomas reported for the 2001 cohort exceeded that reported for the 2000 by almost 1,000.  (Some of this difference may also be better reporting on STEP in 2005 than in 2004.)  The number of reported dropouts was almost the same in both years. Almost 5,000 additional students in the 2001 cohort were reported as still enrolled. Almost five percent of 2001 cohort members had entered a GED program; we do not have data showing the number of these students who may have earned high school equivalency diplomas.

Not surprisingly, New York City, which serves a large percentage of at-risk students, had a lower graduation rate than rest of State schools. The percentage of New York City students who were still enrolled was more than three times greater that in rest of State high schools. Therefore, New York City’s graduation rate may be expected to increase by a larger amount than the rest of State graduation rate.

The calculations used in the present study are different than those used by the New York City Department of Education in their longitudinal cohort studies. New York City names their cohorts according to the expected date of graduation; therefore, the State’s 2001 Cohort would be New York City’s Class of 2005. The Class of 2005 is different from the State’s 2001 cohort in that it does not include students with disabilities educated in self-contained classrooms. In New York City’s graduation-rate calculation, students who earned high school equivalency diplomas are counted as graduates. The inclusion of all students with disabilities in the cohort and the exclusion of high school equivalency diploma recipients from the count of graduates result in the State reporting a lower graduation rate than New York City reports. New York City has not yet published the four-year graduation rate for the Class of 2005.


 

Table 3

The Percentage of Students in the 2001 Cohort by

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005 after Four Years for All Public High Schools

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005

Total Public

Number

Percent

Regents/Local Diploma

137,704

64.2

IEP Diploma

3,877

1.8

Enrolled

39,384

18.4

Transferred to GED

10,226

4.8

Dropped Out

23,303

10.9

Total

214,494

100.0

 

Table 4

The Percentage of Students in the 2001 Cohort by

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005 after Four Years for All New York City High Schools

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005

Total Public

Number

Percent

Regents/Local Diploma

32,092

43.5

IEP Diploma

1,307

1.8

Enrolled

25,735

34.9

Transferred to GED

3,600

4.9

Dropped Out

11,079

15.0

Total

73,813

100.0

 

Table 5

The Percentage of Students in the 2001 Cohort by

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005 after Four Years for All Rest of State High Schools

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005

Total Public

Number

Percent

Regents/Local Diploma

105,612

75.1

IEP Diploma

2,570

1.8

Enrolled

13,649

9.7

Transferred to GED

6,626

4.7

Dropped Out

12,224

8.7

Total

140,681

100.0

 

Rates for the Identified High Schools

Last month we presented the graduation rates of the 2000 cohort in the identified schools. We also presented data showing that these schools have more at-risk students and fewer resources than higher-performing schools. The identified schools serve students who are more likely to be eligible for subsidized lunches, to be disabled, to be limited English proficient, and to have repeated grade 9 than students in the typical public high school. The greater risk factors of these students are not matched with greater resources to meet their needs. In fact, all identified schools are in districts that have high student needs in relation to district ability to raise resources locally. Students in these schools are more likely than other students to be taught by teachers without appropriate certification; they have fewer books and computers per 100 students.

The analyses of the 2000 cohort data submitted in December 2004 were intended primarily to provide improved estimates of cohort graduation and dropout rates at the total public, New York City and rest of State levels.  In calculating the school graduation rates for the 135 identified schools, we only included students who met the criteria for membership in the school accountability graduation rate cohort.  Students who did not meet these criteria were included only in the calculation of district-level graduation rates.

In these analyses of the 2000 and 2001 cohort results based on 2005 STEP data, we have anticipated the cohort definition which will be used for graduation-rate accountability beginning with the 2003 cohort. In calculating the school-level rates, we have included all 2001 cohort members whose last enrollment record in the school showed that they had been enrolled in that school for a minimum of five months.  This procedure will provide the greatest consistency with analyses of future cohorts and provides rates that more accurately reflect the performance of each school.

Table 6 provides summary data for 127 of the 135 schools that were identified in the January 2005 Regents item. The remaining schools were closed. Almost 80 percent of these 127 schools were in New York City. The four-year average graduation rate of these schools was substantially lower than the total public graduation rate (40.0 percent compared with 64.2 percent) and lower than the New York City public school rate, 43.5 percent.  Similarly these schools had substantially higher percentages of students who dropped out or transferred to GED programs than all public high schools. On the other hand, 35.1 percent of students in these schools were still enrolled four years after first entering grade 9 and therefore may graduate at a later date. The attached school-level data shows that only two of the identified schools had four-year graduation rates as high or higher than the State average. Based on the five-year graduation rates of the 2000 cohort, we can expect that more of these high schools will exceed the State average by June 30, 2006.

Table 6

The Percentage of Students in the 2001 Cohort by

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005 after Four Years for 127 Selected High Schools

Outcomes as of June 30, 2005

Total Public

Number

Percent

Regents/Local Diploma

17,856

40.0

IEP Diploma

970

2.2

Enrolled

15,651

35.1

Transferred to GED

2,617

5.9

Dropped Out

7,521

16.9

Total

44,615

100.0

 

 

Table 1:  Information on Selected Schools: 2001 Cohort Data

District Name

School Name

Cohort Enrollment

% Graduated

% IEP Diploma

% Still Enrolled

% Dropped Out

%Transfer to GED

Buffalo

Bennett High School

340

47.4%

2.4%

11.8%

29.7%

8.8%

Buffalo

Burgard Vocational High School

158

38.6%

5.1%

20.9%

24.7%

10.8%

Buffalo

Grover Cleveland High School

235

25.1%

2.6%

26.4%

40.0%

6.0%

Buffalo

Lafayette High School

246

51.6%

2.8%

16.3%

13.4%

15.9%

Buffalo

Riverside Institute Of Technology

248

31.0%

1.2%

18.5%

43.1%

6.0%

Buffalo

Seneca Vocational High School

171

5.8%

2.3%

71.3%

14.6%

5.8%

Buffalo

South Park High School

311

29.3%

6.8%

17.7%

39.9%

6.4%

Rochester

East High School

584

34.6%

2.1%

20.2%

26.7%

16.4%

Rochester

John Marshall H S

286

36.0%

3.1%

20.6%

21.3%

18.9%

Rochester

School Without Walls

69

42.0%

0.0%

30.4%

11.6%

15.9%

Amsterdam

Amsterdam High School

317

57.4%

2.2%

13.9%

19.9%

6.6%

Hempstead UFSD

Hempstead High School

438

39.5%

0.5%

33.3%

23.5%

3.2%

Roosevelt UFSD

Roosevelt High School

221

43.4%

0.5%

26.7%

27.6%

1.8%

Freeport UFSD

Freeport High School

553

53.5%

0.4%

37.1%

7.8%

1.3%

New York City CSD # 1

C M S P - Marte Valle Secondary School

72

43.1%

5.6%

31.9%

16.7%

2.8%

New York City CSD # 2

Legacy School For Integrated Studies

85

1.2%

0.0%

65.9%

18.8%

14.1%

New York City CSD # 2

High School For The Humanities

553

45.0%

0.9%

31.8%

18.3%

4.0%

New York City CSD # 2

Seward Park High School

328

31.4%

5.8%

33.2%

24.7%

4.9%

New York City CSD # 2

CES Vanguard High School

102

45.1%

0.0%

45.1%

7.8%

2.0%

New York City CSD # 2

Washington Irving High School

612

39.5%

0.2%

32.4%

23.0%

4.9%

New York City CSD # 2

Repertory School

40

42.5%

2.5%

42.5%

10.0%

2.5%

New York City CSD # 2

Park West High School

384

32.3%

3.1%

29.9%

28.1%

6.5%

New York City CSD # 2

Manhattan Comprehensive Night HS

306

28.1%

0.0%

55.6%

15.4%

1.0%

New York City CSD # 2

Humanities Preparatory School

52

53.8%

1.9%

36.5%

5.8%

1.9%

New York City CSD # 2

Chelsea Vocational High School

201

34.3%

5.5%

37.8%

16.9%

5.5%

New York City CSD # 2

Norman Thomas High School

636

39.3%

4.1%

36.0%

15.6%

5.0%

New York City CSD # 2

High School Communication Graphic Art

441

27.0%

2.0%

42.2%

21.5%

7.3%

New York City CSD # 2

Art And Design High School

316

60.8%

2.2%

30.4%

1.6%

5.1%

New York City CSD # 2

School For The Physical City

53

5.7%

0.0%

67.9%

18.9%

7.5%

New York City CSD # 3

Wadleigh Arts High School

112

52.7%

4.5%

30.4%

9.8%

2.7%

New York City CSD # 3

Louis D. Brandeis High School

457

34.6%

1.8%

37.4%

21.9%

4.4%

New York City CSD # 4

Park East High School

65

61.5%

1.5%

21.5%

10.8%

4.6%

New York City CSD # 4

Central Park East Secondary School

83

4.8%

0.0%

74.7%

14.5%

6.0%

New York City CSD # 4

Urban Peace Academy

59

18.6%

3.4%

57.6%

15.3%

5.1%

New York City CSD # 5

Bread & Roses Integrated Arts HS

89

47.2%

0.0%

40.4%

7.9%

4.5%

New York City CSD # 7

Alfred E. Smith Vocational High School

236

43.2%

3.0%

24.2%

26.3%

3.4%

New York City CSD # 7

Samuel Gompers Vocational HS

294

50.7%

6.5%

20.7%

17.3%

4.8%

New York City CSD # 7

Health Opportunities Program

113

62.8%

1.8%

31.9%

2.7%

0.9%

New York City CSD # 8

Adlai E. Stevenson High School

678

26.8%

2.8%

45.6%

19.3%

5.5%

New York City CSD # 8

New School For Arts And Sciences

75

24.0%

1.3%

46.7%

25.3%

2.7%

New York City CSD # 9

William H. Taft High School

337

14.8%

0.6%

29.4%

50.1%

5.0%

New York City CSD #10

Walton High School

741

28.7%

3.8%

43.5%

19.7%

4.3%

New York City CSD #10

Theodore Roosevelt High School

480

18.3%

6.0%

32.3%

31.9%

11.5%

New York City CSD #10

De Witt Clinton High School

981

55.8%

3.6%

28.2%

7.8%

4.6%

New York City CSD #10

John F. Kennedy High School

880

32.3%

1.0%

37.5%

21.8%

7.4%

New York City CSD #10

University Heights High School

82

59.8%

1.2%

24.4%

9.8%

4.9%

New York City CSD #10

Grace H. Dodge Vocational High School

267

40.1%

1.9%

33.0%

19.1%

6.0%

New York City CSD #11

Herbert H. Lehman High School

903

54.5%

1.7%

30.0%

10.9%

3.0%

New York City CSD #11

Christopher Columbus High School

804

40.3%

3.5%

43.4%

6.3%

6.5%

New York City CSD #11

Evander Childs High School

592

30.4%

0.8%

33.4%

26.7%

8.6%

New York City CSD #12

High School Of World Cultures

104

19.2%

0.0%

69.2%

3.8%

7.7%

New York City CSD #12

Bronx Coalition Community High School

98

50.0%

3.1%

22.4%

19.4%

5.1%

New York City CSD #12

Fannie Lou Hamer Freedom School

81

54.3%

4.9%

25.9%

7.4%

7.4%

New York City CSD #12

Wings Academy

93

38.7%

1.1%

50.5%

6.5%

3.2%

New York City CSD #12

Monroe Academy For Business & Law

124

4.0%

0.0%

72.6%

19.4%

4.0%

New York City CSD #12

Monroe Academy For Visual Arts & Design

88

3.4%

0.0%

73.9%

17.0%

5.7%

New York City CSD #13

Brooklyn International High School

74

78.4%

0.0%

13.5%

5.4%

2.7%

New York City CSD #13

Acorn Community High School

109

0.9%

0.0%

90.8%

5.5%

2.8%

New York City CSD #13

George Westinghouse High School

180

30.6%

7.8%

45.0%

6.7%

10.0%

New York City CSD #14

Progress High School

146

49.3%

0.0%

41.1%

8.2%

1.4%

New York City CSD #14

High School For Legal Studies

115

56.5%

0.0%

33.0%

7.0%

3.5%

New York City CSD #14

Automotive High School

102

35.3%

5.9%

33.3%

18.6%

6.9%

New York City CSD #14

Harry Van Arsdale High School

287

35.5%

1.7%

31.4%

27.5%

3.8%

New York City CSD #14

El Puente Academy

33

48.5%

9.1%

36.4%

3.0%

3.0%

New York City CSD  #15

School For Global Studies

78

42.3%

2.6%

38.5%

3.8%

12.8%

New York City CSD  #15

Cobble Hill School For American Studies

224

36.2%

3.1%

40.6%

17.0%

3.1%

New York City CSD #16

Boys & Girls High School

631

41.4%

0.8%

33.6%

15.5%

8.7%

New York City CSD #17

Prospect Heights High School

344

7.0%

1.2%

64.8%

20.6%

6.4%

New York City CSD #17

Erasmus  Campus - Science/Math

196

33.7%

0.0%

40.3%

17.9%

8.2%

New York City CSD #17

Erasmus Campus-Humanities

183

26.2%

1.1%

50.3%

20.2%

2.2%

New York City CSD #17

George W. Wingate High School

351

33.3%

2.6%

36.2%

23.4%

4.6%

New York City CSD #17

Erasmus Campus - Business /Technology

197

45.2%

1.0%

39.1%

10.7%

4.1%

New York City CSD #17

Paul Robeson High School

323

48.0%

0.6%

43.0%

5.0%

3.4%

New York City CSD #18

Samuel J. Tilden High School

483

36.6%

0.6%

45.3%

15.1%

2.3%

New York City CSD #18

Canarsie High School

567

37.9%

6.0%

42.2%

10.9%

3.0%

New York City CSD #18

South Shore High School

474

33.8%

1.9%

38.0%

19.2%

7.2%

New York City CSD #19

East New York Family Academy

76

57.9%

1.3%

30.3%

7.9%

2.6%

New York City CSD #19

Franklin K. Lane High School

759

29.8%

2.5%

47.2%

15.5%

5.0%

New York City CSD #19

Thomas Jefferson High School

337

23.4%

2.1%

47.2%

19.6%

7.7%

New York City CSD #19

William H. Maxwell  Vocational HS l

260

25.4%

2.7%

50.0%

16.5%

5.4%

New York City CSD #20

New Utrecht High School

593

50.1%

1.0%

25.8%

14.5%

8.6%

New York City CSD #20

Fort Hamilton High School

1,046

53.4%

1.2%

21.8%

14.2%

9.3%

New York City CSD #20

Franklin D. Roosevelt High School

752

34.6%

0.9%

34.7%

18.8%

11.0%

New York City CSD #21

Lafayette High School

530

34.2%

1.5%

37.9%

22.5%

4.0%

New York City CSD #21

Abraham Lincoln High School

601

47.9%

1.5%

31.6%

13.1%

5.8%

New York City CSD #21

John Dewey High School

716

53.5%

1.1%

31.4%

10.8%

3.2%

New York City CSD #21

William E. Grady Vocational High School

325

37.8%

1.5%

41.8%

12.0%

6.8%

New York City CSD #22

Sheepshead Bay High School

705

41.6%

2.1%

42.4%

8.8%

5.1%

New York City CSD #23

E B C High School For Public Safety

102

36.3%

2.9%

51.0%

7.8%

2.0%

New York City CSD #32

Bushwick High School

299

23.4%

3.7%

44.8%

25.1%

3.0%

New York City CSD #24

Newtown High School

879

43.3%

0.9%

35.3%

16.8%

3.6%

New York City CSD #24

Grover Cleveland High School

694

43.8%

3.2%

32.9%

15.0%

5.2%

New York City CSD #24

Middle College High School

90

44.4%

0.0%

43.3%

12.2%

0.0%

New York City CSD #24

International High School At Laguardia

109

49.5%

0.0%

46.8%

3.7%

0.0%

New York City CSD #24

High School For Arts And Business

192

50.5%

0.0%

39.6%

8.9%

1.0%

New York City CSD #24

Robert F. Wagner Jr. Institute For Arts & Technology

91

57.1%

0.0%

35.2%

3.3%

4.4%

New York City CSD #24

Queens Vocational High School

281

49.1%

1.1%

32.4%

14.9%

2.5%

New York City CSD #25

John Bowne High School

881

39.4%

1.6%

35.6%

20.0%

3.4%

New York City CSD #25

Flushing High School

626

40.7%

0.6%

33.2%

22.8%

2.6%

New York City CSD #27

August Martin High School

326

39.9%

2.1%

44.8%

5.8%

7.4%

New York City CSD #27

Beach Channel High School

481

45.9%

2.9%

41.6%

5.8%

3.7%

New York City CSD #27

Far Rockaway High School

283

38.5%

2.5%

36.0%

20.8%

2.1%

New York City CSD #27

Richmond Hill High School

768

37.6%

2.2%

41.0%

14.7%

4.4%

New York City CSD #27

John Adams High School

776

6.7%

1.2%

73.7%

13.1%

5.3%

New York City CSD #28

Jamaica High School

513

37.8%

2.5%

30.2%

24.8%

4.7%

New York City CSD #28

Hillcrest High School

739

51.6%

0.8%

28.4%

16.9%

2.3%

New York City CSD #29

Springfield Gardens High School

325

31.4%

0.3%

37.5%

24.9%

5.8%

New York City CSD #29

Math Science Research & Technical Magnet HS

126

58.7%

3.2%

33.3%

3.2%

1.6%

New York City CSD #29

Magnet School Of Law And Government

98

54.1%

0.0%

28.6%

11.2%

6.1%

New York City CSD #29

Business And Computer Application HS

111

27.0%

0.0%

53.2%

4.5%

15.3%

New York City CSD #29

Humanities And The Arts Magnet HS

90

33.3%

3.3%

42.2%

8.9%

12.2%

New York City CSD #30

William Cullen Bryant High School

877

46.0%

2.6%

31.6%

17.6%

2.3%

New York City CSD #30

Long Island City High School

910

44.4%

2.9%

37.4%

13.0%

2.4%

New York City CSD #31

New Dorp High School

459

55.6%

1.3%

32.0%

7.4%

3.7%

New York City CSD #31

Port Richmond High School

601

59.6%

0.8%

24.1%

9.7%

5.8%

New York City CSD #31

Ralph Mckee High School

124

57.3%

13.7%

14.5%

9.7%

4.8%

Syracuse

Corcoran High School

337

64.4%

2.7%

10.7%

14.2%

8.0%

Syracuse

Nottingham High School

303

57.8%

2.6%

13.5%

15.2%

10.9%

Syracuse

Henninger High School

437

46.5%

3.9%

19.0%

22.4%

8.2%

Syracuse

George Fowler High School

302

40.1%

2.3%

20.5%

25.8%

11.3%

Wyandanch UFSD

Wyandanch Memorial High School

124

33.1%

12.9%

21.8%

21.8%

10.5%

Central Islip UFSD

Central Islip Senior High School

453

52.3%

3.1%

23.4%

21.2%

0.0%

Mount Vernon

Mount Vernon High School

648

50.6%

1.2%

25.3%

14.8%

8.0%

Mount Vernon

Nelson Mandela Community High School

62

17.7%

0.0%

61.3%

1.6%

19.4%

Yonkers

Gorton High School

349

43.6%

2.6%

23.2%

7.2%

23.5%

Yonkers

Lincoln High School

294

40.8%

6.5%

27.6%

9.5%

15.6%

Yonkers

Roosevelt High School

384

35.4%

3.4%

28.4%

16.9%

15.9%