THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234

 

TO:

Higher Education and Professional Practice Committee

FROM:

Johanna Duncan-Poitier

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Proposed Amendment to the Rules of the Board of Regents Relating to Procedures for the Evaluation of a Prior Disciplinary History for Authorization to Practice a Licensed Profession

DATE:

July 29, 2005

STRATEGIC GOAL:

Goal 3

AUTHORIZATION(S):

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

Issue for Discussion

 

Should the Regents amend section 24.6 and Part 28 of the Rules of the Board of Regents, relating to procedures for the evaluation of a prior disciplinary history for authorization to practice a licensed profession?

 

Reason(s) for Consideration


            Required by State statute.

 

Proposed Handling

 

The proposed amendment is before the Committee for discussion in September 2005 and will be submitted for action at the November 2005 Regents meeting.

 

Procedural History

 

A Notice of Proposed Rule Making will be published in the State Register on August 17, 2005.

 

Background Information

 

The purpose of the proposed amendment is to establish the procedures for the State Education Department's evaluation of the applicant's prior disciplinary history in another jurisdiction to determine whether the applicant is qualified to practice a licensed profession in New York State under Title VIII of the Education Law.   The amendment is needed to implement a provision in statute that requires the State Education Department to evaluate such prior disciplinary history and authorizes the Department to deny authorization to practice a licensed profession based upon such review.  The amendment establishes due process procedures, including a hearing and appeal process, that would be available to an applicant when the Department determines that there is a substantial question as to the applicant's qualifications for licensure based upon his or her prior disciplinary history.  These procedures are similar to those provided applicants for licensure in good moral character proceedings. 

 

Recommendation

 

N/A

 

Timetable for Implementation

 

The effective date of the proposed amendment is November 24, 2005.

 

 

 

 

Attachment

AMENDMENT TO THE RULES OF THE BOARD OF REGENTS

            Pursuant to sections 207, 6501, 6504, 6506, and 6507 of the Education Law.

            1.  Section 24.6 of the Rules of the Board of Regents is amended, effective November 24, 2005, as follows:

            24.6 Review of questions of moral character and evaluation of prior disciplinary history.

            The Committee on the Professions shall review and determine questions of moral character, and evaluate and determine an applicant's qualifications to practice the licensed professions based upon a prior disciplinary history, in accordance with the provisions of Part 28 of this Title.

            2.  Part 28 of the Rules of the Board of Regents is amended, effective November 24, 2005, as follows:

PART 28

[DETERMINATION OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER IN THE PROFESSIONS]

PROCEEDINGS TO DETERMINE GOOD MORAL CHARACTER AND TO EVALUATE PRIOR DISICPLINARY HISTORY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PRACTICE THE LICENSED PROFESSIONS

SUBPART 28-1

DETERMINATION OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PRACTICE THE LICENSED PROFESSIONS

[28.1] 28-1.1 . . .

[28.2] 28-1.2 . . .

[28.3] 28-1.3 . . .

[28.4] 28-1.4 . . .

[28.5] 28-1.5 . . .

[28.6] 28-1.6 . . .       

[28.7] 28-1.7 . . .

[28.8] 28-1.8 . . .

SUBPART 28-2

EVALUATION OF PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PRACTICE THE LICENSED PROFESSIONS

28-2.1 Prior Disciplinary History.  For purpose of this Subpart, prior disciplinary history means: 

 (a) While engaged in practice in another jurisdiction, the applicant has been subject to disciplinary action by a duly authorized professional disciplinary agency of such other jurisdiction, where the conduct upon which the disciplinary action was based would, if committed in New York State, constitute practicing the profession beyond its authorized scope, with gross incompetence, with gross negligence on a particular occasion, or with negligence or incompetence on more than one occasion under the laws of New York State; or

(b) While engaged in practice in another jurisdiction, the applicant has voluntarily or otherwise surrendered his or her professional license in another jurisdiction after a disciplinary action was instituted by a duly authorized professional disciplinary agency of such other jurisdiction, based on conduct that would, if committed in New York State, constitute practicing the profession beyond its authorized scope, with gross incompetence, with gross negligence on a particular occasion, or with negligence or incompetence on more than one occasion under the laws of New York State. 

28-2.2 Purpose. 

The purpose of this Subpart is to establish procedures by which the department shall evaluate the prior disciplinary history, as defined in section 28-2.1 of this Subpart, of an applicant in order to determine whether the applicant is qualified to practice a licensed profession under Title VIII of the Education Law. 

28-2.3 Information. 

All information indicating that an applicant has a prior disciplinary history shall be referred to the director of the Office of Professional Discipline or his or her designee.

28-2.4 Investigation. 

The director of the Office of Professional Discipline, or his or her designee, shall arrange for a full and complete investigation of the circumstances surrounding a prior disciplinary history.  If it is determined that a reasonable question exists as to the applicant's qualifications to practice a licensed profession based upon the applicant's prior disciplinary history, then the director, or his or her designee, shall submit the results of the investigation, including any letters of reference from peers or others which may have been submitted by the applicant, to a panel of the appropriate professional State Board for its review. The panel shall consist of three or more members of the State Board.

28-2.5 Review. 

Upon such review, the panel, by majority vote, may conclude in favor of the applicant to the effect that the applicant's qualifications to practice a licensed profession based upon a prior disciplinary history are adequate, thereby fulfilling the licensure, endorsement, or permit requirement, and the applicant and the director of the Division of Professional Licensing Services shall be notified of such conclusion by the Office of Professional Discipline. If, upon such review, the panel concludes, by a majority vote, that a substantial question exists as to the applicant's qualifications to practice a licensed profession based upon his or her prior disciplinary history, the applicant shall be notified thereof. Upon the written request of the applicant, within 30 days after receipt of such notice, the department shall schedule a hearing on such question.

28-2.6 Hearing.

(a) The applicant shall be given 15 days notice, by mail, of the time and place of the hearing and a statement of the matters asserted which raised the question of the applicant's qualifications to practice a licensed profession based upon his or her prior disciplinary history.

(b) The applicant may be represented at the hearing by an attorney, may cross-examine witnesses, may produce witnesses, and except as limited in this subdivision may present evidence on the conduct underlying the applicant's prior disciplinary history.  In cases in which the applicant in his or her prior disciplinary history has been found guilty of professional misconduct, or has admitted such guilt, and has had an opportunity for a hearing in the other jurisdiction, the evidence in the hearing in this proceeding shall be limited to a consideration of whether the conduct for which the applicant has been found guilty or admitted guilt is sufficiently egregious to result in a denial of authorization to practice the licensed profession in New York State, and whether the prior disciplinary action constitutes a prior disciplinary history as defined in section 28-2.1 of this Subpart.

(c) The hearing, at which a verbatim record shall be taken, shall take place before a panel consisting of three or more members of the appropriate professional State Board, and before an administrative officer admitted to practice as an attorney in the State of New York, designated by the department. Such administrative officer shall have authority to rule on all motions, procedures and other legal objections, but shall not be entitled to vote in the determination of the panel.

(d) The determination of the panel shall be made by a majority vote of the panel and shall be rendered in a written report which shall be drafted by the administrative officer, shall reflect the determination and recommendations of the panel, and shall be subject to the approval of and signature by the panel chairperson on behalf of the panel. Copies of the report shall be forwarded to the director of the Division of Professional Licensing Services and to the applicant.

28-2.7 Appeal. 

The applicant or the director of the Office of Professional Discipline may appeal the determination of the panel relating to the applicant's qualifications to practice a license profession based upon his or her prior disciplinary history by filing a written notice of appeal therefrom with the Committee on the Professions within 30 days after service of the report of the panel upon the party taking the appeal. In the event no appeal is taken from the determination of the panel, the determination of the panel shall be final. In the event either party appeals from the determination of the panel, the appellant may submit a brief to the Committee on the Professions and the opposing party within 30 days after filing the notice of appeal. An answering brief may be filed by the opposing party with the Committee on the Professions within 20 days after the receipt by the opposing party of the brief submitted by the appellant. The Committee on the Professions may affirm, reverse or modify the determination of the panel and/or make such other determination as it may deem just and proper under the circumstances. The determination of the Committee on the Professions shall be final and copies thereof shall be forwarded to the applicant and to the director of the Office of Professional Discipline.

28-2.8 Reapplication.

Whether or not the applicant appeals from the determination of the panel, the applicant may reapply for licensure, endorsement, or permit to the director of the Division of Professional Licensing Services after the expiration of 18 months from the date of service of the report of the panel.

28-2.9 Proficiency examination.

If the Committee on the Professions determines that the applicant is otherwise qualified to practice a licensed profession based upon his or her prior disciplinary history, but has failed to remain current with developments in the profession, and a substantial question is presented as to the applicant's current fitness to enter into the active practice of the profession, the Committee on the Professions may require that the applicant take and obtain satisfactory grades on a proficiency examination satisfactory to the department prior to the issuance of a license, endorsement, or limited permit.