|     THE STATE 
      EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY 
      OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 | 
 
| TO: | The Honorable the Members of the Board of Regents | 
| FROM: | James A. Kadamus | 
| COMMITTEE: | Subcommittee on State Aid | 
| TITLE OF 
      ITEM: | Legislative Advocacy for Regents 2004-05 Proposal on State Aid to School Districts | 
| DATE OF 
      SUBMISSION: | January 28, 2004 | 
| PROPOSED 
      HANDLING: | Discussion | 
| RATIONALE FOR 
      ITEM: | Policy Implementation | 
| STRATEGIC 
      GOAL: | Goal 2 | 
| AUTHORIZATION(S): |   | 
 
SUMMARY:
 
With approval of your aid proposal at your December 2003 meeting, attached for your consideration are some materials on your 2004-05 State Aid Proposal and a draft plan for advocacy for your consideration.
 
Also available at your meeting will be the full proposal with technical supplement, a pamphlet with highlights of the proposal and a briefing on the Governor’s budget recommendations for school year 2004-05. Under separate cover, I will provide you with talking points and other materials to help with your advocacy.
 
Attachments
 
 
The Regents State Aid proposal for 2004-05 
implements a new, multi-year approach to State and local funding of public 
schools designed to close the student achievement gap.  It proposes a Foundation Formula for the 
distribution of State Aid that assists school districts with the costs of 
general education instruction, to be phased in over a seven-year period.  The goal of the Regents proposal 
is:
 
The State's system of funding for education should provide adequate resources through a State and local partnership so that all students have the opportunity to achieve the State’s learning standards, including resources for extra time and help for students.
 
            
This new approach to State Aid has four basic 
components:
 
District’s State Aid = [Foundation Cost  X Pupil Needs Index X Regional Cost 
Index] - Expected Local Contribution
 
§ The Foundation Cost is the cost of providing general education services in New York schools, measured by determining the instructional costs of districts that are performing well.
§         
The Pupil Needs Index recognizes the added costs of providing extra 
time and extra help for students to succeed in school.  It is measured by the number of students 
eligible for free and reduced-price lunch and students living in geographically 
sparse areas of the State.  
§         
The Regional Cost Index is an adjustment that recognizes regional 
variations in purchasing power around the State.  It is measured based on wages of 
non-school professionals in each region of the State.  
§ The Expected Local Contribution is an amount school districts are expected to spend as their fair share of the total cost of general education. It is measured by multiplying the district tax base by an expected tax rate adjusted by district income per child. The Expected Local Contribution is not a mandated tax rate, but a way of determining a local share in order to calculate State Aid.
 
Other aids that are proposed separately from Foundation Aid include: expense-based aids (Building and Transportation); aid for pupils with disabilities; Regional Services Aid for the Big 5 districts; aid for career and technical education; and other categorical aids (e.g., Universal Pre-K, BOCES Aid, Bilingual Grants/Limited English Proficient Student Aid, Textbook Aid, Library Materials Aid, and other programs).
                
In the first year, Exhibit A shows that an 
$880 million increase is proposed, with $508 million of this for Foundation 
Aid.  Exhibit B shows that when the 
proposal is fully implemented, it will provide $14.35 billion in Foundation Aid, 
a $5.98 billion increase in Foundation Aid over 2003-04.  Over time, this flow of aid to high need 
districts will have a significant impact in closing the student achievement 
gap.
 
Exhibit C shows that, in 2004-05, the first 
year of the Regents proposal, 84 percent of the increase in school aid would go 
to high need school districts to close the achievement gap.  Exhibits D and E show the share of 
computerized aids for school districts grouped by Need-Resource Capacity 
category in the first year of the proposal and with full implementation. 

Exhibit B
Regents Foundation Aid Proposal
New York State
(all figures in millions)
| Base Year Funding | Regents Foundation Aid | Change from Base | |
| 2003-2004 School Year | $8,370 | ----- | ----- | 
| 2004-2005 School Year | ----- | $8,878 | $508 | 
| 2010-11 School Year | ----- | $14,350 | $5,980 | 


 
Goals
·        
Long 
Term: Passage of the 
proposal during the 2004 legislative session.
·        
Short 
Term: Support for the 
proposal from the Governor (Division of the Budget), the leadership of the 
Assembly and Senate, and the chairs of the education and financial 
committees.
·        
Interim 
Checks:
-        
Inclusion of 
concepts in the Executive budget proposal
-        
Introduction of 
legislation
-        
Bill reported 
out of Committee and progressing through the legislative 
process
-        
Letters of 
support from educational associations, parents and the business 
community
 
1.      
SED 
Advocacy
·        
Involved 
Regents are: 
-        
State Aid 
Advocacy Task Force
-        
Subcommittee on 
State Aid
-        
EMSC-VESID 
Committee
-        
All 
Regents
 
·        
Involved 
staff:
-        
Commissioner 
Mills, Chief Operating Officer, Counsel and Chief of Staff, EMSC Deputy, 
Coordinator of School Operations and Management, Director of Education Finance 
and State Aid Work Group coordinator. Advice is sought from NYSED’s Director of 
Communications and Legislative Coordinator.   SED’s State Aid Work Group and the 
Legislative Coordinating Team provide periodic advice.
 
2.      
Advocacy 
Information
·        
Regents 
proposal with technical supplement
·        
Pamphlet
·        
Briefing on 
Governor’s budget recommendations
·        
Talking 
points
·        
Frequently 
asked questions and suggested answers
·        
Articles 
(education association journals)
 
3.      
Anticipated 
sources of support and how they will be engaged
·        
Support
-        
School 
superintendents, principals and business officials, including the Midstate 
School Finance Consortium
-        
Presidents of 
boards of education
-        
Student 
advocacy groups such as the Educational Priorities Panel and the Emergency 
Coalition for Universal Pre-K
-        
Conference of 
Large City Boards of Education
-        
Parents 
interested in extra time and help opportunities for their 
children
-        
Directors of 
special education
 
·        
Engagement
-        
Regents 
advocacy with local legislators and statewide leaders
-        
Public forum 
with Regents
-        
The State 
Education Department’s Educational Finance Advisory Group
-        
Widespread use 
of a pamphlet and articles with highlights of the proposal
-        
Participation 
in meetings held by associations and advocacy groups
-        
Correspondence
 
4.      
Key 
Legislators
1.                  
Senate
Temporary President and Majority Leader  
Minority Leader  
Chair, Senate Education Committee, selected 
Education Committee members 
Ranking Minority Member, Senate Education 
Committee 
Chair, Senate Finance Committee  
Chair of Senate Select Commission on 
Disabilities 
 
2.                  
Assembly
Speaker  
Majority Leader  
Minority Leader  
Chair, Assembly Education Committee, selected 
Education Committee members  
Ranking Minority Member, Assembly Education 
Committee  
Chair, Assembly Ways and Means Committee  
Chair of the Assembly Task Force on People 
with Disabilities 
Chair and Co-chair, Black, Puerto Rican and 
Hispanic Legislative Caucus 
Chair, Puerto Rican/Hispanic Task 
Force
 
5.      
Governor's and 
Other Executive Offices
 
6.      
Legislative 
advocacy throughout the legislative process
 
Significant events:
§         
CFE Study on 
the Cost of an Adequate Education (February 28, 2004)
§         
Governor’s 
Commission on Education Reform (March 1, 2004)
§         
Education 
Finance Research Consortium Symposium on School Finance (March 4, 
2004)
§         
State budget 
(April 2004)
§         
Final date for 
State solution (July 30, 2004)
 
Reach out and participate in statewide 
solutions:
§         
Sound basic 
education task force with educational associations, convened by 
CFE
§         
School 
facilities task force with educational associations, convened by 
CFE
§         
Accountability 
task force with educational associations, convened by CFE
§         
Discussions of 
similarities and differences of different aid proposals: Regents, Midstate, NYS 
Association of School Business Officials, Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Education 
Conference Board, Governor’s and legislative budgets