|     THE STATE 
      EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY 
      OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 | 
 
| TO: | The Honorable the Members of the Board of Regents | 
| FROM: | Rebecca H. Cort | 
| COMMITTEE: | EMSC-VESID | 
| TITLE OF 
      ITEM: | Impartial hearings for students with disabilities | 
| DATE OF 
      SUBMISSION: | January 28, 2004 | 
| PROPOSED 
      HANDLING: | Approval | 
| RATIONALE FOR 
      ITEM: | To ensure timely impartial hearings as required by Federal Regulations | 
| STRATEGIC 
      GOAL: | 4 | 
| AUTHORIZATION(S): |   | 
 
SUMMARY:
 
Attached is a proposed amendment of section 200.5(i) of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. Supporting materials for the proposed amendment are available upon request from the Secretary to the Board of Regents.
 
The purpose of the proposed amendment is to prescribe procedures for the conduct of impartial hearings to ensure that such hearings are conducted in a timely manner pursuant to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its implementing regulations (34 CFR Part 300). The proposed amendment would require an impartial hearing officer (IHO) to schedule the hearing or a prehearing conference to begin within 14 days of being appointed. Each party would have up to one day to present its case. The amendment provides for an IHO to assist unrepresented parties at all stages of the proceedings. It would also allow for a prehearing conference to be scheduled by the IHO to simplify or clarify the issues, establish dates to complete the hearing, identify evidence and witnesses and/or address any administrative matters to ensure a timely hearing. An IHO would have the authority to limit the examination and number of witnesses, exclude evidence that is irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable or repetitious, take direct testimony by affidavit and receive memoranda of law not to exceed 30 pages in length in a specific format. A specific extension of the required timeline would only be granted by the impartial hearing officer after considering the cumulative impact of several factors, including the impact on the child's educational interests and any financial consequences likely to be suffered by a party in the event of a delay. The decision must be rendered and mailed no later than 14 days from the date the impartial hearing officer closes the record.
 
A Notice of Proposed Rule Making was published in the State Register on August 20, 2003. The proposed amendment was discussed at the September 2003 Regents Meeting. The proposed amendment was subsequently revised in response to public comment, and a Notice of Revised Rule Making was published in the State Register on December 31, 2003. An Assessment of Public Comment is attached.
 
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Regents take the following action:
 
VOTED:
That paragraphs (3) and (4) of subdivision (i) of section 200.5 of the Regulations of the Commissioner be amended as submitted, effective May 1, 2004.
 
Attachment
 
 
                        
1.  Paragraph (3) of 
subdivision (i) of section 200.5 of the Regulations of the Commissioner is 
amended, effective May 1, 2004, as follows:
                        
(3)  The board of education 
shall arrange for such a hearing to be conducted in accordance with the 
following rules:
                        
(i)  Appointment from the 
impartial hearing officer list must be made in accordance with the rotational 
selection process established in section 200.2(e)(1) of this Part and the 
administrative procedures established by the board of education pursuant to 
section 200.2(b)(9) of this Part.
                        
(a)  The rotational selection 
process must be initiated immediately, but not later than two business days 
after receipt by the school district of the written request for the 
hearing.
                        
(b)  The impartial hearing 
officer may not accept appointment unless he or she is available to initiate the 
hearing within the first 14 days of being appointed [contacted] by the 
school district.
                        
(ii)  The board of education 
or trustees shall immediately appoint an impartial hearing officer to conduct 
the hearing.  A board of education 
may designate one or more of its members to appoint the impartial hearing 
officer.
                        
(iii)  The hearing, or a 
prehearing conference, shall be scheduled to begin within the first 14 days of 
the impartial hearing officer's appointment, unless an extension is granted 
pursuant to subparagraph (i) of paragraph (4) of this 
subdivision.
                        
(iv)  The impartial 
hearing officer shall be authorized to administer oaths and to issue subpoenas 
in connection with the administrative proceedings before 
him/her.
                        
[(iv)](v)  A written 
or, at the option of the parents, electronic verbatim record of the proceedings 
before the impartial hearing officer shall be maintained and made 
available to the parties.
                        
[(v)] (vi)  At all 
stages of the proceeding, where required, interpreters of the deaf, or 
interpreters fluent in the native language of the student’s parent, shall be 
provided at district expense.  
                        
[(vi)  The impartial hearing 
officer shall preside at the hearing and shall provide all parties an 
opportunity to present evidence and testimony.]
                        
(vii)  The parties to the 
proceeding may be accompanied and advised by legal counsel and by individuals 
with special knowledge or training with respect to the problems of students with 
disabilities.  At all stages of 
the proceeding, the impartial hearing officer may assist an unrepresented party 
by providing information relating only to the hearing 
process.
                        
(viii) In the event the impartial hearing officer requests an 
independent evaluation as part of a hearing, the cost of the evaluation must be 
at public expense.
                        
(ix)  In the event the 
impartial hearing officer determines that the interests of the parent are 
opposed to or are inconsistent with those of the student, or that for any 
other reason the interests of the student would best be protected by appointment 
of a guardian ad litem, the impartial hearing officer shall appoint a guardian 
ad litem to protect the interests of such student, unless a surrogate parent 
shall have previously been assigned.  
The impartial hearing officer shall ensure that the procedural due 
process rights afforded to the student’s parent pursuant to this section are 
preserved throughout the hearing whenever a guardian ad litem is 
appointed.
                        
(x)  The hearing shall be 
conducted at a time and place which is reasonably convenient to the parent and 
student involved and shall be closed to the public unless the parent requests an 
open hearing.
                        
(xi)       
A prehearing conference with the parties may be scheduled.  Such conference may be conducted by 
telephone.  
A transcript or 
a written summary of 
the prehearing conference shall be entered into the record by the impartial 
hearing officer.   A 
prehearing conference is for the purposes of:
                        
(a)  simplifying or 
clarifying the issues;
                        
(b)  establishing dates(s) 
for the completion of the hearing;
                        
(c)  identifying evidence 
to be entered into the record;
                        
(d)  identifying witnesses 
expected to provide testimony; and/or
                        
(e)  addressing other 
administrative matters as the impartial hearing officer deems necessary to 
complete a timely hearing.  
                        
(xii)  The parents, 
school authorities, and their respective counsel or representative, shall have 
an opportunity to present evidence, compel the attendance of witnesses and to 
confront and question all witnesses at the hearing.  Each party shall have the right to 
prohibit the introduction of any evidence, the substance of which has not been 
disclosed to such party at least five business days before the 
hearing.
                        
(a)  Additional disclosure of 
information.  [At] Except as 
provided for in section 201.11 of this Title, at least five business days 
prior to a hearing, each party shall disclose to all other parties all 
evaluations completed by that date and recommendations based on the offering 
party’s evaluations that the party intends to use at the hearing.  An impartial hearing officer may bar any 
party that fails to comply with this requirement from introducing the relevant 
evaluation or recommendation at the hearing without the consent of the other 
party.
                        
(b)  The impartial hearing 
officer, wherever practicable, shall enter into the record a stipulation of 
facts and/or joint exhibits agreed to by the parties. 
                        
(c)  The impartial hearing 
officer may receive any oral, documentary or tangible evidence except that the 
impartial hearing officer shall exclude evidence that he or she determines to be 
irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable or unduly repetitious.  The impartial hearing officer may 
receive testimony by telephone, provided that such testimony shall be made under 
oath and shall be subject to cross examination. 
                        
(d)  The impartial hearing 
officer may limit examination of a witness by either party whose testimony the 
impartial hearing officer determines to be irrelevant, immaterial or unduly 
repetitious. 
                        
(e)  The impartial hearing 
officer may limit the number of additional witnesses to avoid unduly repetitious 
testimony.
                        
(f)  The impartial hearing 
officer may take direct testimony by affidavit in lieu of in-hearing testimony, 
provided that the witness giving such testimony shall be made available for 
cross examination. 
                        
(g)  The impartial hearing 
officer may receive memoranda of law from the parties not to exceed 30 pages in 
length, with typed material in minimum 12 point type (footnotes minimum 10 point 
type) and not exceeding 6 1/2 by 9 1/2 inches on each page.  
                        
(xiii)  Each party shall 
have up to one day to present its case unless the impartial hearing officer 
determines that additional time is necessary for a full, fair disclosure of the 
facts required to arrive at a decision.  
Additional hearing days, if required, shall be scheduled on consecutive 
days wherever practicable.
                        
[(xii)](xiv) The parents shall have the right to determine whether 
the student shall attend the hearing.
                        
[(xiii)](xiv)  If, by 
mutual agreement of the parties, the impartial hearing officer is deemed 
incapacitated or otherwise unavailable or unwilling to continue the hearing or 
issue the decision, the board of education shall rescind the appointment of the 
impartial hearing officer and appoint a new impartial hearing officer in 
accordance with the procedures as set forth in this 
subdivision.
                        
[(xiv)](xvi)  
Commencing July l, 2002, each board of education shall report information 
relating to the impartial hearing process, including but not limited to the 
request for, initiation and completion of each impartial hearing, to the Office 
of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities of the 
State Education Department in a format and at an interval prescribed by the 
commissioner.
                        
2.  Paragraph (4) of 
subdivision (i) of section 200.5 of the Regulations of the Commissioner is 
amended, effective May 1, 2004, as follows:
                        
(4)  Except as provided in 
section [200.16(g)(a)]  
200.16(g)(9) of this Part and section 201.11 of this Title, the 
impartial hearing officer shall render a decision, and mail a copy of the 
written, or at the option of the parents, electronic findings of fact and the 
decision to the parents, to the board of education, and to the Office of 
Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities (VESID) of 
the State Education Department, not later than 45 days after the receipt by the 
board of education of a request for a hearing or after the initiation of such a 
hearing by the board.  In cases 
where extensions of time have been granted beyond the applicable required 
timelines, the decision must be rendered and mailed no later than 14 days from 
the date the impartial hearing officer closes the record.  
The date the record is closed 
shall be indicated in the 
decision.  The record 
of the hearing and the findings of fact and the decision shall be provided at no 
cost to the parents.  All personally 
identifiable information shall be deleted from the copy forwarded to 
VESID.
                        
(i) An impartial hearing officer may grant specific extensions of time 
beyond the periods set out in this paragraph, in subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (3) of 
this 
subdivision, or in section 
200.l6(g)(9) of this Part at the request of either the school district or the 
parent.  Each extension shall be 
for no more than 30 days.  The 
reason for [the] each extension must be documented in the hearing record. 
[In such case, the impartial hearing officer shall render the decision and mail 
a copy of the written, or at the option of the parents, electronic findings of 
fact and the decision to the parents, to the board of education, and to VESID no 
later than 14 days from the date the record is closed, including any post 
hearing submissions, and the transcript is received by the impartial hearing 
officer.]
                        
(ii) The impartial hearing officer may grant a request for an 
extension only after fully considering the cumulative impact of the following 
factors:
                        
(a)  the impact on the 
child’s educational interest or well-being which might be occasioned by the 
delay;
                        
(b)  the need of a party 
for additional time to prepare or present the party’s position at the hearing in 
accordance with the requirements of due process;
                        
(c)  any financial or 
other detrimental consequences likely to be suffered by a party in the event of 
delay; and
                        
(d)  whether there has 
already been a delay in the proceeding through the actions of one of the 
parties.
                        
(iii) Absent a compelling reason or a specific showing of substantial 
hardship, a request for an extension shall not be granted because of school 
vacations, a lack of availability resulting from the parties' and/or 
representatives' scheduling conflicts, settlement discussions between the parties or other 
similar reasons.  Agreement of the 
parties is not a sufficient basis for granting an 
extension.
                        
(iv) The impartial hearing officer shall respond in writing to each 
request for an extension.  The 
response, shall become part of the record.  
The impartial hearing officer may render an oral decision to an oral 
request for an extension, but shall subsequently 
provide that decision in writing and 
include it 
as part of the record.  For each extension granted, the 
impartial hearing officer shall set a new date for rendering his or her 
decision, and notify the parties in writing of such 
date.
                        
(v) The impartial hearing officer shall determine when the record is 
closed and notify the parties of the date the record is closed.  The decision of the impartial hearing 
officer shall be based solely upon the record of the proceeding before the 
impartial hearing officer, and shall set forth the reasons and the factual basis 
for the determination.  The 
decision shall reference the hearing record to support the findings of 
fact.  The impartial hearing officer 
shall attach to the decision a list identifying each exhibit admitted into 
evidence.  Such list shall identify 
each exhibit by date, number of pages and exhibit number or letter.  In addition, the decision shall include 
an identification of all other items the impartial hearing officer has entered 
into the record.  The decision 
shall also include a statement advising the parents and the board of education 
of the right of any party involved in the hearing to obtain a review of such a 
decision by the State review officer in accordance with subdivision (j) of this 
section.  The decision of the 
impartial hearing officer shall be binding upon both parties unless appealed to 
the State review officer.