| 
        
        THE 
      STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY 
      OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 | 
 
| TO: | The Honorable the Members of the Board of Regents | 
| FROM: | Johanna 
      Duncan-Poitier | 
| COMMITTEE: | Higher Education and Professional Practice | 
| TITLE OF 
      ITEM: | Regents Accreditation of Teacher 
      Education Recommendation of Accreditation Action: Ithaca College | 
| DATE OF 
      SUBMISSION: | November 19, 2004 | 
| PROPOSED 
      HANDLING: | Approval (Consent Agenda) | 
| RATIONALE FOR 
      ITEM: | Ithaca College relies on the Regents as its accreditation agency for teacher education programs | 
| STRATEGIC 
      GOAL: | Goals 1, 2, and 3 | 
| AUTHORIZATION(S): |   | 
 
SUMMARY:
 
Ithaca College has applied for accreditation 
of its teacher education programs by Regents Accreditation of Teacher Education 
(RATE).  The attached Summary of the 
Application for Accreditation of Teacher Education Programs and Preliminary 
Recommendation for Accreditation Action lists the registered programs leading to 
certification offered by Ithaca College at its campus in Ithaca, New York. 
 
The Board of Regents chartered Ithaca College 
in 1926 and granted it an absolute charter in 1944.  Ithaca College’s charter was originally 
incorporated under the name of The Ithaca College Conservatory and Affiliated 
Schools. Through the years the College has enhanced its mission and program 
offerings to include baccalaureate and master’s degrees in all branches of 
music, physical education, nursing, speech, drama, radio/communications, fine 
arts, liberal arts and sciences, special subjects, and programs leading to 
certification in 13 certification areas.  
Today it is an independent comprehensive institution consisting of five 
schools: the School of Business, Roy H. Park School of Communication, and the 
three schools in which the education programs reside: the School of Health 
Sciences and Human Performance; the School of Humanities and Sciences; and the 
School of Music.
 
Pedagogical cohesiveness rests primarily with 
two faculty-level units:  the All 
College Teacher Education Committee and the Center for Teacher Education. In 
fall 2003, Ithaca College had an enrollment of 6,496, of whom 6,260 were 
undergraduate students and 236 were graduate students. Over 600 candidates were 
enrolled in teacher education programs.  
 
Ithaca’s vision statement 
states:
 
Ithaca 
College strives to become the standard of excellence for residential 
comprehensive colleges, fostering intellect, creativity, and character in an 
active, student-centered learning community.
 
The College’s mission statement 
is:
 
To 
provide a foundation for a lifetime of learning, Ithaca College is dedicated to 
fostering intellectual growth, aesthetic appreciation, and character development 
in our students.  The Ithaca College 
community thrives on the principles that knowledge is acquired through 
discipline, competence is established when knowledge is tempered by experience, 
and character is developed when competence is exercised for the benefit of 
others.
 
A 
comprehensive college that since its founding has recognized the value of 
combining theory and performance, Ithaca provides a rigorous education blending 
liberal arts and professional programs of study.  Our teaching and scholarship are 
motivated by the need to be informed by, and contribute to, the world’s 
scientific and humanistic enterprises.  
Learning at Ithaca extends beyond the classroom to encompass a broad 
range of residential, professional, extracurricular opportunities.  Our undergraduate and graduate students, 
faculty, staff, and alumni all contribute to the learning 
process.
 
Ithaca 
College is committed to attracting a diverse body of students, faculty, and 
staff.  All members of the College 
community are encouraged to achieve excellence in their chosen fields and to 
share the responsibilities of citizenship and service in a global 
community.
 
The goals, purposes, objectives, and 
implementation of the teacher education programs are in keeping with this 
mission.
          
Following a review of the institution’s 
self-study, a team visited Ithaca College in November 2003 as part of the 
accreditation review process.  The 
team conducted an on-site review of evidence, including interviews with college 
and school-based faculty and administrators, teacher candidates, graduates and 
employers. 
 
A draft report of the team’s findings was 
prepared and transmitted to the College for review and comment.  It was the team’s overall assessment 
that the College was in compliance with the standards found in Regents Rules, 
Subpart 4-2.  Areas for improvement 
cited by the team are listed in the attachment.  Upon receiving the College’s comments, 
the Department prepared a final compliance review report for consideration by 
the Higher Education Subcommittee of the State Professional Standards and 
Practices Board for Teaching.  
Information materials on the College’s application and the review process 
are available in the Regents Office.  
The Department’s preliminary recommendation to the Subcommittee was that 
the College’s programs be accredited for a period of seven years.  
At its October 14, 2004 meeting, the Higher 
Education Subcommittee of the State Professional Standards and Practices Board 
for Teaching, on the basis of the record* and prior to making a recommendation 
to the Deputy Commissioner for Higher Education, the PSPB voted that the 
Department’s preliminary recommendation for accreditation action be adopted as 
the Deputy Commissioner’s recommendation, with the following stipulations: 
 
·        
That the annual reports submitted by the 
College as part of the ongoing accreditation process include special focus on 
the following issues:
 
 
 
 
 
·        
That the RATE annual reports submitted by 
Ithaca College be provided to the Subcommittee.
 
The recommendation was approved unanimously 
with six voting members of the Subcommittee 
present.
 
Recommendation:  I recommend that the Regents take the 
following action:  
 
VOTED, that 
the Board of Regents grant accreditation of the teacher education programs 
offered by Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York, listed in the attached Summary of 
Application for Accreditation, and including the stipulations identified above, 
effective November 24, 2004, for a period beginning immediately and ending on 
November 23, 2011.
 
 
 
Attachment
 
* Including the Department’s preliminary recommendation 
for accreditation action, the institution’s self-study, its application for 
accreditation, other documents relevant to the Department’s preliminary 
recommendation, and any additional written submissions by the 
institution.
 
Summary of the Application for Accreditation 
of Teacher Education Programs and Department’s Preliminary Recommendation on 
Accreditation Action
 
Ithaca College, Ithaca, Tompkins County, has 
applied for accreditation of its programs of study leading to teacher 
certification under the Regents Accreditation of Teacher Education 
(RATE).
 
Preliminary Recommendation for Accreditation 
Action:            
 
Accreditation for a period of seven years. 
 
Teacher Education Programs to Be 
Accredited:
 
Ithaca College currently offers 17 
baccalaureate programs leading to initial New York State teacher certification 
and 1 master’s program leading to initial/professional 
certification:
Degree 
and Program Title                                  
Certification
B.A., 
Biology 7-12                                              
Biology 7-12  - 
Initial
B.A., 
Chemistry                                      
Chemistry 7-12  - 
Initial
B.S., 
Chemistry                                      
Chemistry 7-12  - 
Initial
B.A., 
Physics                                                      
Physics 7-12 - Initial
B.A., 
English                                                       
English 7-12  - 
Initial
B.A., 
Social Studies                                            
Social Studies 7-12 - Initial 
B.A., 
French                                                       
French 7-12 - Initial
B.A., 
German                                                      
German 7-12 - Initial
B.A., 
Spanish                                                     
Spanish 7-12 - Initial
B.A., 
Mathematics                                              
Mathematics 7-12 - Initial
B.S., 
Mathematics-Computer Science   
Mathematics 7-12 - Initial  
B.S., 
Teaching Students with Speech and     Speech and 
Language
  Language Disabilities                                 
   Disabilities (all 
grades) - Initial
M.S., 
Teaching Students with Speech and   
Speech and Language 
          
Language Disabilities                                    
Disabilities (all grades) – 
Initial/Professional
B.M., 
Performance/Music Education                  
Music (all grades) - Initial  
B.M., 
Music Education                           
Music (all grades) - Initial
B.S., 
Health Education and Physical              
Health (all grades) & Physical
  Education (Teaching)                                    
Education (all grades) dual/initial 
B.S., 
Physical Education (Teaching)              
Physical Education (all grades) – Initial  
B.S., 
Health Education (Teaching)                 
Health Education (all grades)  
- Initial
  
The College does not offer any distance 
learning programs.  Over 600 
candidates are enrolled in the teacher preparation programs; 29 are non-white 
ethnic/racial individuals.
 
The education programs reside in three 
separate schools of the College: the School of Health Sciences and Human 
Performance; the School of Humanities and Sciences; and the School of 
Music.  Each school sets its own 
policies, procedures, admissions, advisement, field placements, faculty 
assignments, resource allocation, teacher candidate assessment and program 
evaluation.  Each determines its own 
curricula and how its coursework meets State certification and accreditation 
standards.  Each school has its own 
philosophy, which reflects the College’s long-standing vision and commitment to 
excellence.   
 
Two faculty-level units, the All College Teacher Education Committee (ACTEC) and the Center for Teacher Education (CTE), are responsible for maintaining cohesiveness in the pedagogy of teaching coursework. ACTEC, which is composed of representatives of academic departments offering teacher education programs, serves as a standing committee of the College and reports to the Provost. It coordinates teacher education activities, addresses state and accrediting bodies issues, investigates new developments in the field impacting teacher education, and initiates curricular matters. However, each of the three individual schools operates under what is described as “coordinated autonomy” providing for informed decision making at each School offering teacher education programs.
 
          
The Center for Teacher Education 
(CTE) reports to the Assistant Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies and 
coordinates matters pertaining to teacher education.  For example, all RATE accreditation 
activities were coordinated through the CTE.  It also offers a required teacher 
education course, Social Foundations of Education, and the Child Abuse, Drug and 
Alcohol Abuse, and Violence Prevention seminars.  It administers several outreach programs 
through which candidates gain experiences working with diverse populations.  The Director of the CTE chairs 
ACTEC.
 
Summary of Findings and Institutional 
Response:
 
Following a review of the institution’s 
self-study, a RATE team visited Ithaca College in November 8 – 12, 2003 as part of the 
accreditation review process.  The 
team conducted an on-site review of evidence, including documents in the exhibit 
room, interviews with College and school-based faculty and administrators, 
candidates, and alumni.  It was the 
team’s overall assessment that the College is in compliance with the standards 
found in Regents Rules, Subpart 4-2.  
The team, however, did identify areas for improvement on 8 of 9 
standards.   
 
In its response, the College accepted all but 
two of the recommendations.  In 
addition, it offered comments and clarified issues raised in 6  “areas for improvement” These are 
summarized below.  
 
 
Standard 
3. Standards 
for program registration:  
  
 
4.     
English and Music Teacher Education 
Programs:  The team raised concerns regarding the 
lack of exposure to nonwestern literary works for teacher candidates pursuing 
English and Music certification.  
Although course offerings were part of the curriculum, there was no 
assurance that candidates would be required to undertake such study. This matter 
was also an issue raised by external program reviewers. 
 
The College’s response satisfactorily 
addressed both program areas and   
identified curriculum, activities and specific courses covering this 
concern. For example, Music candidates are required to take three courses in 
which study outside the Western European tradition is a fundamental course 
objective and assessment outcome.  
Examples given include African, Latin American, Asian, and Greek music 
curricula. 
 
The English Department concurred with the 
team findings regarding this issue and is in the process of hiring a specialist 
in multicultural literature by fall 2004. The department is also considering a 
requirement in American, multicultural and/or 20th century literature 
to be in place by fall 2005.   
One more faculty addition was under consideration to create more courses 
outside the Western European literary tradition. 
 
 
5. Teaching Students with Speech and 
Language Disabilities:  The team raised curriculum 
issues regarding depth of experiences in preparing candidates in Teaching 
Students with Speech and Language Disabilities to work with a range of students 
from diverse populations and second language learners.    
 
The College’s response indicates that TSSLD students do have exposure to individuals from racially, ethnically, and culturally diverse backgrounds, including field experiences with Even Start and Head Start, which include diverse populations. The program assures 50 hours of field experiences, practica, and student teaching placements with ethnically diverse students. The response notes that about 10% of the clients seen at College Speech and Hearing Clinic are English language learners. The College takes care to distinguish between candidates’ experiences with individuals from ESL backgrounds and those from “ethnically diverse” populations, noting the differences between cultural and linguistic speech differences and speech and language disorders, highlighting potential ethical and professional implications.
 
 
 
 
 
Standard 
4.  Teaching effectiveness of 
graduates:   
 
 
6. The Team recommends that a plan be 
developed to implement a standard process for the assessment of student teachers 
across programs and suggests possible centralization and coordination through 
the Center for Teacher Education. It also encourages the use of electronic 
portfolios as a means for assessment, as was being initiated in the School of 
Health Science and Human Performance at the time of the visit. 
 
The College’s response acknowledges that programs share commonalities with respect to the assessment of student teachers, indicating that ACTEC will continue to investigate other points of agreement and possible means of collaboration in candidate and program evaluation. But it also highlights the diverse nature of the teacher education programs, noting that a standardized process for student teaching assessment would not serve either the candidates or the teacher education programs well. The use of electronic portfolios for assessment of candidates is being considered.
 
7. The Team is recommending a centralized 
coordinated initiative to provide experiences in working with students with 
diverse characteristics and ethnic backgrounds through the 
CTE.
 
The College’s response indicates that this is 
one of the key priorities of the Spring 2001 Ithaca College Institutional Plan: 
to “enhance the diversity of students, faculty, and staff and create a 
supportive environment for the entire College community.” The College will 
implement teacher education activities through ACTEC, however, the field 
experiences will remain the province of the individual schools that house 
teacher education programs.  Each 
school will more fully document and share through ACTEC how it is complying with 
this important standard. 
 
 
Standard 
5.  Assessment of candidate 
achievement:  
 
9.  
In collaboration with CTE and ACTEC, the Team recommends that the teacher 
education programs should design coherent, articulated criteria for admission 
and continuation in the teacher education programs. 
 
The College’s response states that the teacher education programs share many common admissions elements and ACTEC will continue to discuss criteria for admission. Nevertheless, each teacher education program has markedly different curricula and expectations, so common criteria for admission would not serve candidates or programs well. The College will continue to make explicit the criteria for admissions and continuation in each of its programs and ACTEC will continue to document and share this information.
 
 
Standard 
6.  
Resources:  
 
15. The Team notes that the College does not have dedicated library resource space for teacher education, and that departmental budgets should reflect support for teacher education. It recommends a coordinated plan among library staff, CTE and the each department’s teaching option faculty coordinator.
 
The College’s response is that a single dedicated library resource space is not appropriate given the diversity of IC teacher education programs. It does agree that greater allocation of resources for library acquisitions are necessary. The College Librarian has created a special budget line for all teacher education programs, which will be administered through ACTEC.
 
Given that the College has presented evidence 
that the identified Areas of Improvement are being addressed or will be 
addressed, although not within the context, structure, or format, identified by 
the team, the Office of College and University Evaluation has no remaining 
concerns.  
 
September 
9, 2004