|
THE STATE
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF |
|
TO: |
Full Board |
|
FROM: |
Jean C. Stevens |
|
SUBJECT: |
|
|
DATE: |
July 24, 2006 |
|
STRATEGIC
GOAL: |
Goals 1 and 2 |
|
AUTHORIZATION(S): |
|
Issues for
Decision
Should the
Regents approve the staff’s recommendations regarding the proposed second
renewal charter for the Our World Neighborhood Charter School in
Should the
Regents approve the staff’s recommendations regarding the proposed second
renewal charter for the
Required by State statute, Education Law 2852.
Proposed Handling
These questions will come before the full
Board for final action on July 26, 2006.
Procedural History
Under the
New York Charter Schools Act of 1998, the Board of Regents is authorized to make
recommendations regarding proposed charters submitted to it from another charter
entity. The Board is also
authorized to make recommendations regarding the renewal of existing charters on
applications submitted directly to it as a charter entity. Upon receipt of an
application for renewal or for the establishment of a new charter school, the
Board of Regents shall review such applications and proposed charters in
accordance with the standards set forth in the Charter Schools Act. Subsequent to its approval, the Board
must then issue the initial charter or the renewal charter for each school, as
applicable.
Background
Information
We have received one proposed second renewal
charter from the Trustees of the State University of New York (SUNY) and
one proposed second renewal charter from the Chancellor of New York City Public
Schools. These will be presented to you at your July meeting. The proposed second renewal charter from SUNY is for Our
World Neighborhood Charter School.
The proposed second renewal charter from the Chancellor is for
The Our World Neighborhood Charter School (OWNCS) is located in
The John V. Lindsay Wildcat Academy Charter School (JVLWACS) is located
in
Copies of the above are available for your review by contacting Shelia Evans-Tranumn at 718-722-2796.
Recommendation
VOTED: That the Board of
Regents approve and grant the proposed second renewal charter and extend the
provisional charter for one year up through and including July 31, 2007 for the
following charter school:
·
Our
VOTED: That the Board of
Regents approve and grant the proposed second renewal charter and extend the
provisional charter for two years up through and including August 31, 2008 for
the following charter school:
·
Timetable for
Implementation
The Regents action will become effective for the Our World Neighborhood Charter School on August 1, 2006.
The Regents
action will become effective for the
New York
State Education Department
Summary of
Address:
Board of Trustees
President: Steve Zimmerman
Renewal Period: August 1, 2006 – July 31, 2007
District of
Location:
Charter Entity: SUNY Board of Trustees
Institutional Partner(s): N/A
Management
Partner(s): Formerly Mosica
Education, Inc; none during renewal period
Grades Served per
Year: K-8 (K-8)
Projected Enrollment
per Year: 645 (700)
·
Our
·
For
performance on State assessments, see Attachment 1.
·
In
2004-2005, the School has achieved a Performance Index of 171 on grade 4 English
Language Arts and 196 on grade 4 math assessments.
·
The
School set the goal of having 60% of all students enrolled for at least two
years score on or above Level 3 in ELA and mathematics. Nearly 93% of those students are
performing on or above Level 3 in math; approximately 75% are performing on or
above Level 3 in ELA.
·
OWNCS
receives Title I funds and is a school in good standing under the No Child Left
Behind Act.
·
According to the SUNY Board of Trustees
renewal report, there were no identified concerns with the School’s internal
audit structure.
·
The
Statement of Activities for the year ending June 30, 2005 reports the school has
net assets of $1,565,399.
·
Fiscal
auditors opinions in each year of the charter have been unqualified. The Charter Schools Institute reports
the School “has met its financial reporting requirements with few
exceptions.”
·
When
fully enrolled with 700 students, the charter school will receive no more than
0.0385% of the New York City Department of Education budget (See Potential
Fiscal Impact Chart below).
·
Programmatic and fiscal audits comply with
all requirements made of public schools.
·
The
School is in stable financial condition.
·
For
OWNCS’ Change in Net Assets, see Attachment 2.
Our
|
School
Year |
Number of
Students |
Projected
Payment* |
Projected
Impact |
|
2006-07 |
700 |
$6,943,969 |
.0385% |
*Assumes a 3
percent annual increase in the District’s budget from the base of $17 billion in
2004-2005 and a 4.5 percent annual increase in the average expense per pupil per
year from the 2004-2005 rate of $9,084.
·
OWNCS
issues an annual parent survey. 372
families responded to the survey.
On a rating scale from 1 to 10 (with 10 indicating strong agreement),
parents rated the overall experience for their children at 8.85; the educational
program at 8.69; and their satisfaction with the instructional staff at
9.02.
·
The
School reports student persistence rates annually (the number of students in
attendance in June as compared to the number of those students who return in
September of that year). In each
year of the charter, the rate has grown from 86% (between Year 1 and Year 2) to
94% (between Year 2 and Year 3) to 96% (between Year 3 and Year
4).
·
The
School has a waitlist of approximately 448 applicants. The list has grown over the past three
years from 184 (Spring 2003) to 219 (Spring 2004) to 369 (March
2005).
The SUNY Board
of Trustees recommends approving the School for a short-term planning year
renewal to assess the capacity and effectiveness of the School’s self-management
plan. The chartering entity finds
strong evidence of educational soundness, fiscal soundness and parental
satisfaction. The Charter School
Institute finds that granting the one-year renewal “would likely improve student
learning and achievement and materially further the purposes of the Act as set
forth in subdivision 2850(2) of the Education Law. In addition, granting a one year renewal
will assist in building sufficient data to be analyzed as part of the
Institute’s full renewal review.”
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Regents approve the proposed second
renewal to the charter and grant an extension to the provisional charter for one
year up through and including July 31, 2007.
Reason for
Recommendation
(1) The charter school meets the requirements set out in Article 56 of
the Education Law and all other applicable laws, rules, and regulations; (2) the
charter school will be operated in an educationally and fiscally sound manner;
and (3) granting the extension is likely to improve student learning and
materially further the purposes set out in subdivision two of section
twenty-eight hundred fifty of Article 56 of the Education
Law.
Attachment 1
|
Assessment |
Year |
% Level
1 |
% Level
2 |
% Level
3 |
% Level
4 |
Performance Index |
|
Grade 4 ELA |
2003 |
14 |
45 |
31 |
10 |
127 |
|
Grade 4 ELA |
2004 |
6 |
44 |
50 |
0 |
144 |
|
Grade 4 ELA |
2005 |
4 |
21 |
46 |
29 |
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade 4 Math |
2003 |
10 |
18 |
56 |
16 |
162 |
|
Grade 4 Math |
2004 |
0 |
26 |
57 |
17 |
174 |
|
Grade 4 Math |
2005 |
0 |
4 |
56 |
40 |
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade 4 Science |
2004 |
10 |
23 |
51 |
16 |
157 |
|
Grade 4 Science |
2005 |
0 |
21 |
46 |
33 |
179 |
Attachment 2
Change in Net Assets 2000-01 through
2004-05*
|
Year |
Change
in Net Assets |
|
2002-03 |
$275,773 |
|
2003-04 |
$553,045 |
|
2004-05 |
$840,468 |
*Source: Audited Financial Statements provided as a part
of each Annual Report
New York
State Education Department
Summary of
Address:
Board of Trustees
President: Amelia V. Betanzos
Renewal Period: September 1, 2006 – August 31, 2008
District of
Location:
Charter Entity: Chancellor, New York City Department of
Education
Institutional Partner(s): Wildcat Service Corporation, Inc.
Management
Partner(s): N/A
Grades Served per
Year: 8+ - 12 (8+ - 12)
Projected Enrollment
per Year: 450 (500)
Academic
Performance
·
The
·
For
performance on State assessments, see Attachment 1.
·
In
2005, 8.3 percent of the 8+ students at JVLWACS demonstrated proficiency in
ELA. In 2005, 0 percent of the 8+
students at JVLWACS demonstrated proficiency in math. The 8+ program is designed to serve
students who have previously been retained in grade 8.
·
Based
upon 2004-05 State assessment data, JVLWACS has been identified as being
furthest from State standards.
Because the school serves many students who are overage and undercredited
upon admission to the school, it is not unexpected that many students do not
graduate within four years of initial entry in grade 9 and the school is
farthest from State standards.
·
According to the NYC DOE renewal report, the
passing rate for JVLWACS students participating in the ELA and math Regents
exams in 2004-2005 was higher than any other comparable transfer school.
·
Of the
students in the 2001 grade 9 cohort, 60.6 percent of the students did not take the
Regents English exam, 17.1 percent scored between 0 and 64, and 22.2 percent
scored between 65 and 100. On the
Regents math exam, 80.8 percent of the students did not take the exam, 10.1
percent scored between 0 and 64, and 9.1 percent scored between 65 and 84.
·